|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1067
   |
Posted - 2014.02.26 00:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
I have noticed a few groups (while in their home hole) claim to want a fight, then proceed to warp 6 dreads and 4 carriers to the wh, along with the usual smattering of T3s. I make sure to note who those groups are. Then, if I am FCing, I will also make sure to never put a single ship in their wormhole.
I am all for losing ships in a good/tough fight, but i refuse to pad anyones killboard
No trolling please |
Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1067
|
Posted - 2014.02.26 00:30:00 -
[2] - Quote
Senn Denroth wrote:Or some groups just post it all over the forums so you don't have to do the leg work 
If I went by forum posts and general shiit talking, we would never fight anyone  I'd rather just find out for myself what people are about.
That said, efforts to warn the generral public are always appreciated lol
No trolling please |
Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1069
|
Posted - 2014.02.27 16:21:00 -
[3] - Quote
Wormhole fights tend to look the same because of the nature of wormholes. They are NOT permanent , infinite mass structures. You also end up 5k or less from the wormhole. No jumping in your nano gang and expecting to survive when you have a bubble up and a massive gang on the other side waiting for you. Low mass, big tank ships are the best option (T3's).
Now, I will even admit that I don't enjoy the wormhole meta of armor t3s, guardians, etc..I'm hoping they "balance" the T3 ships enough to where other ships are just as viable
No trolling please |
Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1071
|
Posted - 2014.02.27 21:27:00 -
[4] - Quote
AssassinationsdoneWrong wrote:
(You managed to get me finally agreeing with Bane and Proc).
Hell doesn't always freeze over. But when it does, you agree with Bane.
No trolling please |
Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1071
|
Posted - 2014.02.27 23:31:00 -
[5] - Quote
Proclus Diadochu wrote:
Bane is right. All hail Bane.
Summarized for everyone else who didn't read it. 
No trolling please |
Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1072
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 00:12:00 -
[6] - Quote
Joan Greywind wrote:
It doesn't matter what you think or I think, the numbers show that wh are stagnant, losing members, same fights over and over with no evolution of any sort of meta,
Can you post a link to the numbers that show wormholes are stagnant? I am genuinely curious to see those statistics.
No trolling please |
Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1094
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 02:42:00 -
[7] - Quote
In the past, Two Step was able to provide some statistics, such as POS's killed in each class of wormhole. I am assuming Chitsa or that other guy (his name escapes me) can get the same stuff.
No trolling please |
Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1131
|
Posted - 2014.02.28 15:53:00 -
[8] - Quote
I think the one key point you are missing Joan is that wh space gives us access to all kinds of space. This allows us to have fun in high/low/null if we want. To limit ourselves to one small spot in Eve to pvp, when you have such access is foolish, at best.
Secondly, I have already explained why the meta is the way it is. T3s offer the best tank/dps/mass combination in game. It's quite simple to see why it hasn't changed. No other ships come close. I would like to see more options in the future, but for right now, that is your best option.
Lastly, post the numbers you saw.
No trolling please |
Bane Nucleus
Sky Fighters
1147
|
Posted - 2014.03.03 17:47:00 -
[9] - Quote
Bane Nucleus wrote:
Can you post a link to the numbers that show wormholes are stagnant? I am genuinely curious to see those statistics.
Joan Greywind, please read this again
No trolling please |
|
|
| |
|